Donald Trump’s declaration of a “golden age” for America marks an ambitious vision for the future. While this evokes his earlier campaign slogan, Make America Great Again (MAGA), the “golden age” concept introduces a forward-looking agenda that implies national strength, economic prosperity, and global influence. However, one of the most important elements to Trump’s vision lies in how the U.S. handles its relationship with China. The U.S.-China dynamic is arguably the most important factor in determining America’s future trajectory, both economically and geopolitically. As the world’s two largest economies, their interactions will set the tone for global stability or disruption.

The U.S.-China Relationship: A Defining Geopolitical Battleground

At the heart of Trump’s potential to achieve his “golden age” for America lies the crucial relationship with China. Over the past decade, China has emerged as the most formidable challenger to the U.S.’s global supremacy, with increasing economic power and military reach. How Trump manages this relationship will be key to his legacy. The stakes couldn’t be higher: the U.S. needs to safeguard its economic interests, maintain its leadership on the world stage, and prevent China from rising too far beyond its influence.

While Trump’s rhetoric during his previous term was combative, focusing on issues such as trade deficits and intellectual property theft, his posture has evolved. His actions after returning to office suggest that Trump could be open to strategic adjustments in his approach to China, even while still maintaining a tough stance. Trump’s willingness to engage with China diplomatically, demonstrated through his gestures like inviting President Xi Jinping to his inauguration, hints at the possibility of more balanced relations moving forward.

The Evolving Strategy: Shifting from Confrontation to Negotiation

Trump’s early administration was characterized by aggressive rhetoric and unilateral actions toward China, most notably through the imposition of tariffs. The idea was to push China to the negotiating table and force it into an economic restructuring that favored the U.S. However, the results were mixed, and both countries found themselves locked in a prolonged trade war. Trump’s approach also often raised concerns over the risks of escalating tensions into broader geopolitical conflict.

Now, with his return to office, Trump appears to be shifting his tone. For example, in discussions about Chinese-owned apps like TikTok, Trump has taken a more measured approach than his earlier “ban them all” rhetoric. He’s instead talked about creating a framework where an American company could potentially buy a significant stake in the app to protect U.S. security concerns without resorting to a full ban. This represents a tactical pivot, with Trump increasingly open to negotiations and potentially greater cooperation with China, signaling that his strategy might be evolving to accommodate new realities.

The Role of Tariffs: A Tool, Not a Solution

One of Trump’s most famous tools during his first term was the imposition of tariffs, particularly on Chinese goods. While his tough stance aimed to force China to renegotiate trade terms, the reality is more complicated. Tariffs often result in higher costs for American consumers and global supply chain disruptions. Furthermore, China has developed its own response strategies over the years, including diversifying its economic and trade partnerships around the world.

China’s proactive moves in creating strong trade partnerships, especially through initiatives like the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a massive free trade deal between Asia-Pacific nations, are signs that China has prepared for the long game. As a result, any short-term tariff solutions may have a limited impact on the broader economic landscape. Trump’s new approach might need to focus on more strategic uses of tariffs, balancing them with diplomatic efforts and long-term negotiations.

Beyond Trade: The Geopolitical Challenges

While trade tensions between the U.S. and China have dominated headlines, the broader geopolitical context also plays a significant role in the relationship. Trump will need to address issues like technology, cybersecurity, regional influence, and military expansion. China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific, as well as its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which seeks to expand China’s economic and infrastructural footprint globally, presents a direct challenge to the U.S.-led global order.

Trump’s leadership in this area will need to be measured and multifaceted. On one hand, he must continue to challenge China’s growing global influence, especially in critical sectors like 5G and artificial intelligence. On the other hand, he must maintain strategic partnerships with countries like India, Japan, and Australia, whose influence is crucial to countering China’s rise in the Indo-Pacific region. The success of these efforts will depend on how well Trump can balance confrontation with collaboration, pushing back against China’s power while also finding areas of common ground, such as climate change, counterterrorism, and global health security.

Biden’s China Strategy: A Tougher, Coordinated Approach

While Trump’s approach to China was confrontational and often unilateral, his successor, Joe Biden, has taken a more coordinated, multilateral stance. Biden’s strategy has seen the continuation of Trump-era tariffs, but with the addition of a broader containment strategy that includes strengthening alliances across the globe. This includes deepening relationships with key Asia-Pacific nations, such as India and Japan, and rallying allies in Europe and NATO to take a tougher stand against China.

Biden’s administration has also taken steps to limit China’s access to critical technologies, such as semiconductors, and has pushed for global coalitions to isolate China in areas like 5G network development. This more expansive, cooperative strategy contrasts with Trump’s earlier “America First” stance, suggesting a long-term, multi-front campaign aimed at limiting China’s rise. Trump, however, may choose to revisit these strategies, adjusting his tactics depending on shifting global circumstances.

China’s Resilience: Economic Ties and Strategic Partnerships

As tensions continue to rise, China is not simply sitting idly by. The country has been diversifying its economic ties with nations across the world, from ASEAN countries to Latin America and the Middle East. China’s growing economic footprint in these regions—especially through investments, trade deals, and infrastructure projects—gives it a buffer against potential U.S. sanctions or tariffs.

Read More: Why Elon Musk’s Influence in Europe Could Be More Dangerous Than You Think

For instance, the China-ASEAN free trade area has been significantly upgraded in recent years, with trade between China and ASEAN countries soaring to nearly $912 billion in 2023. Additionally, China’s trade relationships with the Middle East have grown, positioning it as the dominant economic partner for many nations that were once aligned with the U.S. This diversification means that China is less vulnerable to punitive measures from the U.S., and in many ways, it has positioned itself to weather any potential trade war more effectively than it did in the past.

The Long Game: Cooperation Amid Competition

Despite the ongoing tensions, there are also areas where the U.S. and China can cooperate, given their shared global interests. Issues like climate change, nuclear proliferation, and global health present opportunities for collaboration. Trump, though known for his tough rhetoric, may ultimately seek to strike a balance between competition and cooperation, understanding that while the rivalry is important, mutual recognition and joint efforts can address the world’s pressing issues.

As both nations navigate this complex relationship, Trump’s ability to manage U.S.-China ties effectively will determine the success of his “golden age” vision for America. Instead of a simple trade war, Trump will likely find himself engaging in a more nuanced geopolitical balancing act—one that will require both confrontation and collaboration, depending on the issue at hand.

Read More: Donald Trump’s Two-Day Frenzy: Why His Return Already Feels Like a Full Political Era